For every named prospect, Hyper writes an email, a LinkedIn DM and a landing page. All three argue the same hook, written from the same research brief. No mail-merge, no templates.
The mail-merge below is what most outbound looks like today: a few variables dropped into a template that's been sent to thousands. The Hyper version under it is written for one named buyer, in the tone of voice your reps would use, from the research brief.
Every prospect gets a dedicated three-surface sequence. The email is written from the research brief for that one account. The LinkedIn DM carries the same hook in the second surface's register. The landing page is a one-prospect, one-page argument the email and DM point at.
One hook runs through all three, so whichever surface earns attention first, the argument continues. The copy is AI end-to-end. The point is consistency across surfaces and fidelity to the research, not speed.
AI outbound calling is a capability, not a headline. It sits alongside the three core surfaces as an opt-in module, enabled per client where industry and jurisdiction allow.
Hi {first_name}, saw that {company_name} is a {industry} company based in {city}. I wanted to share how we help {industry} teams with…
I led outbound for two UK fintechs that doubled pipeline without doubling headcount. Monzo's recent product release and the hiring pattern in revenue ops suggest the team is thinking about the same problem…
· revenue engine